icosapent ethyl Side Effects
Also known as: Vascepa
Analysis of 7,801 adverse event reports submitted to the FDA from 2011 to 2025.
Total Reports
7,801
Death-Related
497
6.4% of reports
Hospitalizations
1,413
18.1% of reports
Top Indication
Product Used For Unknown Indication
Most Reported Adverse Reactions
Who Reports Side Effects
Gender Distribution
Age Distribution
Reporting Trend by Year
Reactions in Death Reports
Top reactions reported in 497 reports where death was an outcome. These are voluntarily reported and do not establish causation.
| Reaction | Reports |
|---|---|
| DEATH | 224 |
| CONDITION AGGRAVATED | 129 |
| OFF LABEL USE | 106 |
| MATERNAL EXPOSURE DURING PREGNANCY | 101 |
| TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS | 68 |
| FIBROMYALGIA | 67 |
| OVERLAP SYNDROME | 67 |
| STOMATITIS | 67 |
| HYPOAESTHESIA | 65 |
| URTICARIA | 65 |
| SWELLING | 64 |
| FATIGUE | 63 |
| ALOPECIA | 61 |
| HELICOBACTER INFECTION | 61 |
| HYPERTENSION | 61 |
| OSTEOARTHRITIS | 61 |
| MOBILITY DECREASED | 59 |
| NASOPHARYNGITIS | 59 |
| PYREXIA | 52 |
| VOMITING | 52 |
Reactions in Hospitalization Reports
Top reactions in 1,413 reports where hospitalization was an outcome.
| Reaction | Reports |
|---|---|
| DRUG INEFFECTIVE | 139 |
| FATIGUE | 120 |
| OFF LABEL USE | 98 |
| PNEUMONIA | 95 |
| CONDITION AGGRAVATED | 93 |
| HEADACHE | 92 |
| HYPERTENSION | 92 |
| PYREXIA | 92 |
| DYSPNOEA | 89 |
| VOMITING | 89 |
| HYPOAESTHESIA | 84 |
| SWELLING | 81 |
| TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS | 81 |
| DIZZINESS | 80 |
| NASOPHARYNGITIS | 80 |
| HOSPITALISATION | 78 |
| STOMATITIS | 78 |
| ASTHENIA | 77 |
| FIBROMYALGIA | 77 |
| DIARRHOEA | 76 |
Nearby — Related Medications
What the FAERS Data Reveals About icosapent ethyl Side Effects
The FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) contains 7,801 voluntary reports linked to icosapent ethyl and its brand equivalents (Vascepa), spanning 2011 through 2025. Of those, 497 (6.4%) listed death as an outcome and 1,413 (18.1%) involved hospitalization. The most common indication reported alongside adverse events was Product Used For Unknown Indication.
Demographic breakdowns help contextualize who is being exposed to the drug. Of reports with known sex, 47% were female and 52% male; age distribution skews toward 45-64, with 1,701 reports in that bracket. The single most reported reaction is product odour abnormal with 963 submissions, followed by product physical issue and off label use.
FAERS is a signal-detection tool, not a scorecard. Reports are voluntary, and a single case may list multiple suspect drugs, so numbers above should not be read as incidence rates or per-patient risk. Widely prescribed drugs naturally accumulate more reports than niche therapies even when individual risk is low. These aggregates are useful for spotting patterns that merit further pharmacovigilance, not for choosing between medications. This page is for educational reference only and is not medical advice — speak with a licensed clinician about any side-effect concerns.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.